Font Police: 20 Fonts to Avoid to Maintain Your Readers’ Sanity

Posted in Fonts, Tips, Web Design • Posted on 46 Comments

Fonts perform a great role in your design, but you should know which fonts to avoid, too. Either in typography or in web page design, the use of proper fonts is a great advantage. Sometimes, designs become disasters just because the font is not used properly or, in some sense, does not fit the occasion.

This calls for the proper selection. For decades, the Internet has constantly provided us with a vast database of fonts, all segregated by variety, style and use. This lets us choose which to use. Because of this wide variety that we have, it is just fitting to say that nobody can have an excuse why they chose the wrong font. It’s also safe to say that with the liberty each designer has, he should pick the right fonts at the right time.

fontpolicek

But some fonts, of course, tend to have become more popular because of their availability. Operating systems like Windows have provided default fonts for the user. It removes the hassle of choosing, downloading and installing them. This convenience has been good because of the easy access of readily available fonts but has become detrimental too because the fonts that were popularly used became cliché. Hence, they are to be avoided.

I tried to make a list of fonts that you should never use again. These were selected because they were too cliché and very hard to put into the design. The essence of this list is not to fully discriminate mainstream and cliché fonts but to properly use them for fitting occasions.

Here are they:

Comic Sans MS

fonts-that-you-should-never-use01

Comic Sans MS is one of the basic Windows fonts installed in your computer as you boot up Windows. Microsoft first introduced this font in 1994. Comic Sans was designed by Vincent Connare as a child-oriented font. Its inspiration was mainly gotten from comic books in Connare’s office (they were Watchmen lettered by Dave Gibbons and The Dark Knight Returns lettered by John Costanza). According to him, he originally designed the font to be used with speech bubbles and not for general use. But since then a lot of people have fallen in love with this font and it became a cliché.

One main reason why you should stop using this font is it is childish. It lacks formality, though it is used for formal events and announcements (doing facepalm  right there).  Unless of course you’re running a website for kids, or designing a first-birthday invitation, you could use these kinds of fonts (I said these kinds because you have other choices than Comic Sans).

Never use it for swimming pool rules signboards, grave epitaphs, commemorative plaques, hospitals, government job applications, heart transplant activities, and books.

Never use this font when you are designing for business sites, or warning signs. It might give people an impression that your client is childish and might not take them seriously. Never write DO NOT ENTER in Comic Sans, else, the reader might see it as “Do not enter says stupid childish whoever”.

Use Comic Sans MS only when your audience are below 6 years old (parent-letters not included), when you’re writing speech bubble contents for comics, and when you’re client is dying and his last will and testament said so.

Visit: Comics Sans Criminal

Subtitute Fonts:

  • Lexia Readable
  • P22 Kaz Pro
  • JM Doodle Medium
  • FF Friday Regular
  • Sharktooth Regular
  • Comic Strip

Papyrus

fonts-that-you-should-never-use03

Remember that term paper about Egypt your teacher told you to write? I bet you used Papyrus back then! And I bet too, that you might as well, if you can, forget that shameful design experience.

Papyrus came out in 1983. Chris Costello successfully managed to design it after six months of manual hand-drawing. According to him, it was designed to imitate the pre-modern writing in papyrus leaves.

Be that as it is nobly designed, this font wasn’t really seen in papyrus rolls alone. You can now see it in captchas, advertisements, signboards, banners, books, and even in most typographic designs! It seemed to have been seen everywhere to the point that you might even vomit if you see it again in your page. This saturation resulted to people hating the font. (For proof, find iheartpapyrus.com.)

Travis Estvold once wrote via blog.echoenduring.com:

“I, myself, hate when people use Papyrus—the font, that is, not the plant or the paper. I’ll be the first to admit it’s a strange thing to detest but whether it’s justified, this loathing is my constant companion. Surely, if someone proclaims the most bothersome part of his day is unearthing new and terrible ways in which locals have used and displayed a particular typeface, he must also be a designer. This is true… I’m not sure when my obsession with the font began, but my poor girlfriend, who has been a party to most of my Papyrus sightings over the past two years, can tell you it’s been building for some time.”

Truly, Papyrus is one of the ‘I-was-used-repeatedly-until-I-became-useless’ type of fonts.

Here’s a list of alternatives to Papyrus.

Curlz MT

fonts-that-you-should-never-use08

Okay, I personally loathe this font. Once a classmate of mine used this font in a letter sent to me and I went nuts. My eyes had a hard time reading and I got dizzy and nauseous! To my anger, I wrote him back. Guess what font I used, WINGDINGS! Imagine the hate in his face.

Curlz was originally designed by Carl Corssgrove and Steve Matteson in 1995. They were added into the default Windows fonts and were also originally created for party invitations. This font copied what happened to the Comic Sans Font, it became to mainstream to a point that people got sick and tired of them.

Aside from that, it lacks formality and authority. You can never use it in coat-and-tie events, warning signs and many more because it will just give your readers an impression of a joke. Curlz also has big issues with legibility. Imagine writing a book with Curlz MT font. People who read your book might sing, ‘You spin my head right round right round’. If you want to make your body readable, do not, not even in your drunk days, use this font in the body.

Now this font, too, has become overused. It’s almost everywhere too! Most people think that just because your website caters to women, you have all the right and privilege in the world to use this font. Actually, the female target market does not oblige you to use Curlz MT. It is very wrong to think that women will fall for cute and curly letters. No, that would never happen. Well you might be able to attract middle-aged ex-cheerleaders who think they are still in middle school. I guess that would make an audience.

Arial

fonts-that-you-should-never-use04

A designer friend of mine once said, if you have Helvetica, use it. Don’t settle for Arial.

According to designworkplan.com, Robin Nicholas and Patricia Saunders originally designed Arial in 1982. It was widely used as the standard typeface for normal computer usage. It became popular after the release of Windows 3.1 where it was installed as free. After that boom, the usage of the Arial font spread like wildfire across the globe.

People may have liked Arial because it is readily available in the operating system. Of course, the mentality is, why buy an expensive font if you could make do with what you have. The result? Arial explosion. Arial on magazines, on street signs, on banners on advertisements and even in TV! Of course this made most designers sick of it. Also, Arial has no proper and true Italics, which made it difficult for body texts to italicize with style.

Good thing, we can have substitutes for Arial nowadays. We can easily swap this ubiquitous font to make your body texts look new.

First is Verdana. Released in 1996, Verdana is one of the more popular substitutes to Arial because aside from its ready availability, Verdana is easier to read. Second is Tahoma. The Tahoma font was released with Win95 as part of the MS Office. It’s also readily available as Verdana is. Third is Trebuchet MS. Trebuchet MS was released with Windows 2000 and looks more like Verdana.

Other substitutes: Calibri, Sego UI and Georgia

Courier New

courier-new

Ever remembered the typewriter? Do you notice the resemblance of the typeface your typewriter produces and the font Courier New? Well, it’s supposed to look like it because it was how Howard “Bud” Kettler thought it to be in 1955. Courier is a slab serif type of font that was originally sold to IBM. It was made to look like a typewriter print because IBM originally made typewriters.

Kettler says that the font was called courier because instead of being a messenger, “a letter can can be the courier, which radiates dignity, prestige, and stability.”

Had it radiated dignity and prestige? I don’t think so. Courier’s stability as a font has been questioned a lot of times. All we know about the courier font is that it is a serif font.  But aside from that, nothing. Courier had been suffixed with ‘New’ but I still see nothing new in it.

Courier are used for certain occasions like film scripts, codes and plain text documents. Web designers avoid courier because its lettering is not properly measured and it suggests a more ancient design. Also, because it was originally designed for typewriters, courier font letters have low-resolution and cannot be placed in the body artistically but it does look good with a green background.

The Courier font is used on movie scripts, novel manuscripts and other forms of literary art. But in web design it has no place, unless you want your website to look like it’s fresh out of the typewriter.

For font alternatives, try Cousine.

Cousine was designed by Steve Matteson as an innovative, refreshing sans serif design that is metrically compatible with Courier New™. Cousine offers improved on-screen readability characteristics and the pan-European WGL character set and solves the needs of developers looking for width-compatible fonts to address document portability across platforms.

Times New Roman

fonts-that-you-should-never-use07

One of the best updates Microsoft Word had in the past years is its use of a new default font. In previous version, I recall that Times New Roman was the default font used. I personally didn’t like Times New Roman because it’s very hard to read and suggests a mood of laziness in it.

What people are saying about  Times New Roman:

“Very corny and boring”

“I just avoid when I can.”

“It’s simply bad, ugly and makes me nervous when I see it.”

“I cannot look at Times New Roman without automatically assuming that it is a placeholder font, waiting to be replaced by something appropriate for the text.“

For a fact, Times New Roman was named after the Times of London, a British newspaper. They needed a new body text font for their paper in 1929. They hired a guy named Stanley Morison of Monotyope, a British company. Morison did the job with Victor Lardent as supervisor and eventually named it Times New Roman.

Then on, the font was used in most body texts and has been popularized as it became Microsoft Office’s default font. This led to its status of being cliché. It became so overly used to a point when people found it disgusting and insulting to use.

Most designers see the Times New Roman font as narrow-spaced because they are originally designed for newspapers and though it is formal in nature, Times New Roman’s bold typeface makes it hard to read and thus loses its formality. Spacing has also been a problem for Times.

If you can avoid it, please do. You can substitute with fonts like Concourse, which is a sans serif font which can be used for more formal situations and legalities. Equity is also a good font as it is a combination of classic and convenient designs. Book Antiqua is also a good candidate and has better spacing flexibility than Times.

Bradel Hand ITC

fonts-that-you-should-never-use02

It might come to his senses that Richard Bradley might soon be sick and tired of seeing his handwriting. I mean, it’s literally everywhere. It might even cause him a very serious headache to even see his penmanship!

Richard Bradley is the designer of the seemingly abused Bradley Hand ITC font. According to Microsoft, this font is an informal script- based font. It is characterized as warm and familiar in nature and has a relaxed rhythm typical to the real handwriting.

Being a readily available font, this font has been used to convey a personal touch in the sans-serif font because fonts like Arial and Helvetica cannot do this. Producing a handwritten-like design will make it look like the designer himself bothered to personally write. That is why it was used in a lot of occasions like posters, school announcements, bulletin boards, cards, invitations and even in story books. But this, sadly, all resulted into chaos as it was turned into a cliché. Aside from this, the Bradley Hand ITC font is ineligible. If you’ll use it for headings and announcements, which should be seen from afar, it will not become visible as it is thin, even if emphasized. Meanwhile, if you’ll use it in the body, your reader will probably go mad because he would not understand the text properly because Bradley Hand’s readability goes lower as it size decreases.

Personally, I wound not suggest any alternative for handwritten fonts because I totally don’t want to use them as they are difficult to place together with other elements in the design. So might as well stick to your Helvetica.

Vivaldi

fonts-that-you-should-never-use05

A guy named Freidrich Peter designed this intricate script typeface. It is very calligraphic and copperplate-ish. Because it is a script font, Vivaldi is commonly used in wedding invitations and other formal events. Vivaldi is pretty formal and good except that it has problems in spacing. Vivaldi characters tend to get crowded because they are not full scripts, meaning their characters are not woven into one stroke only. For a semi-script, it is very much condensed. This results to difficulty in reading. Yes, you may adjust the spacing between letters, but I won’t even think of that in semi-scripts. Expanding the spaces will result to inconsistency in the font design.

One more problem I see with Vivaldi is its caps. When you capitalize a whole word in the Vivaldi font, it would be pretty difficult to read and discern the difference between letters. I tell you. Try it if you don’t believe me.

Kristen ITC

fonts-that-you-should-never-use09

Kristen ITC is one of the cutie-patootie fonts. It was designed by George Ryan for the International Typeface Corporation. It consist of two weights and was inspired by a handwritten menu at a Cambridge restaurant. This font is asymmetric and resembles the handwriting of a toddler. Like Comic Sans, this font is targeted to the child target market and was impliedly drawn to attract little children.

Kristen font users are usually grade schoolers, gradeschool teachers, child psychologists, and other people who work for kids. The font is playful in nature. You can almost see it in your children’s classrooms all saying how life should be good and that they eat a lot of vegetables.

But Kristen should be pretty much avoided. A designer should always think of the issues this font poses. First is that it is has no formality. Using this font in a legal document could make you lose a case. Second thing, is that Kristen’s non-caps are placed in the middle part of the caps. Unlike other fonts that place the non-cap characters as where the cap character baseline are.

Manual spacing could also be a problem as the spacing of the capitals of the font are difficult to measure since the characters are a little bit curved.

Viner Hand

fonts-that-you-should-never-use06

Viner hand is an informal script font developed from the handwriting of John Viner. I’m pretty sure this font sucks because it has been overused, like the others in this list. Commonly, this font has been abused by angsty teenagers and goth wannabes.

Other fonts to avoid using

Mistral

fonts-that-you-should-never-use10

Impact

fonts-that-you-should-never-use11

Symbol

fonts-that-you-should-never-use12

Stencil

fonts-that-you-should-never-use13

Wide Latin

fonts-that-you-should-never-use14

  • Scriptina
  • Bleeding Cowboys
  • Lucida Handwriting
  • Birth of a Hero
  • Wingdings

Conclusion

For a designer, originality is everything. Fresh designs should always be produced by his rather queer mind. He should always be innovative with the design trends that happen around him. He should also be experimental in the trends he use for designing. That is why one must not be satisfied by the fonts present in his computer. He should look and look and look until he finds that font that suits him. Remember, a good designer has no go-to fonts.

94 Written ArticlesWebsiteGoogle+

Rudolph is a geek. He loves reading: books, blogs and even nutrition facts found at the back of products. He also loves basketball. Since joining 1stwebdesigner last year, Rudolph has written several articles that concerns Typography, Wordpress, Freelance Lifehacks, Graphic Design and Showcase of Beautiful Web Designs. He also write poems, movie reviews and he puts them in his blog together with rants and some daily life updates.

46 Comments Best Comments First
  • Jonas

    Monday, August 26th, 2013 12:59

    15

    Arial and times new roman? realy, i don’t think so

    +17
  • PixoMarc

    Monday, August 26th, 2013 10:12

    5

    Someone should really flip out their notebook (like the Police) and give these offenders a ticket! While I agree with you on most of fonts listed here, some fonts are required for designs in a particular niche / genre e.g. Stencil is a good font for military themed designs and so on.

    As for the websites are concerned, I would say that Google fonts are the best bet for those who don’t want to invest in fonts and still design something out of the ordinary. Many clients do insist on certain fonts which may clash with the designer’s view – in this case, it is best to educate the client and show the difference in a design comp.

    +11
  • paolo

    Monday, August 26th, 2013 10:44

    8

    arial and times new roman? are you kiddin? what the hell…
    arial is the main webdesign font….

    +10
    • mmj

      Saturday, August 31st, 2013 06:06

      35

      Indeed, Arial and Times are good typefaces.

      I have a feeling that the general idea behind including them was more that they are so frequently used rather than they are bad fonts, but if being used too frequently is a sin, why recommend Helvetica?

      So that doesn’t make much sense.

      These two dont deserve to be on the same list as Comic Sans or Papyrus.

      +4
  • darrell

    Monday, August 26th, 2013 13:04

    16

    rachel, this site uses

    font-family: “HelveticaNeue-Light”, “Helvetica Neue Light”, “Helvetica Neue”, “HelveticaNeue”, “HelveticaNeueLT”, Helvetica, Arial, “Lucida Grande”, sans-serif;

    this is from the css ( use inspect element feature of your browser ). what this is is a list of prefered font, so, if one isnt found early in the list then it chooses the next font, so, if your computer doesnt have the helvetica fonts listed, this site does use Arial

    +10
  • Emanuele

    Monday, August 26th, 2013 15:22

    20

    I am sorry, but I think Impact is a pretty good font that can be successfully used in different context to create, like, impact. It’s reasonably tall, it’s well rounded and – since it’s intended to be used for big display texts – it reads reasonably well. Clearly, if you use it for the body you are neither a designer nor an entirely sane being.

    I agree on everything else, though.

    +9
  • Oliver Mannay

    Monday, August 26th, 2013 09:39

    1

    Thanks for the article. A quick point about Courier New: I agree that it’s not pretty, mainly because it’s a monospace font, but it’s vital for many web designers. While it’s a horrible choice for almost any other use (and I have seen some terrible examples from ‘designers’ in the past), it’s fantastic for displaying code, and for tables of numbers when you don’t have access to lining numerals and don’t mind that monospace look.

    +4
  • leckerei

    Monday, August 26th, 2013 10:33

    7

    You can add LOBSTER ! The new comic sans !

    +4
    • Katherine

      Monday, September 16th, 2013 13:52

      41

      FAIL. There’s absolutely nothing to support that parallel.

      +2
    • manuel

      Monday, August 26th, 2013 17:00

      24

      nice.. thank you

      +2
  • used impact before

    Monday, August 26th, 2013 09:39

    2

    i used impact once or twice :(

    +3
  • Erinah

    Tuesday, August 27th, 2013 15:27

    31

    Georgia (a serif) as a substitute for Arial???
    Concourse (san serif) as a substitute for Times New Roman???
    Why not simply list all available fonts :))

    Palatino is really a wonderful alternative to Times New Roman (but do not even use the Book Antiqua name, plz)
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Palatino#Book_Antiqua_and_other_unauthorised_versions

    +2
  • Alex

    Tuesday, August 27th, 2013 09:34

    30

    If I hear another so-called designer come out with this tired cliche font-snobbery then I will show them a picture of gassed children in Syria and ask them if the fact that their local take-away used it in their menu is something worth being angry about?

    Designers and typographers care about typography. The general public are subconsciously affected by typography ( the ‘feel’ of quality for example ) BUT they don’t care about it enough to even know what it means.

    It’s up to you as designers to do good stuff with typography. You don’t need to worry about amateurs or beginner designers using poor-taste typefaces. Because you will not use them, and therefore your work will stand out.

    It says to me ‘I’m a little insecure about my work so I must go on about crap typefaces to assert my authority as a designer’.

    +2
  • Falling Brick

    Wednesday, August 28th, 2013 04:37

    32

    True, except these -Times New Roman, Arial.

    +2
  • mmj

    Saturday, August 31st, 2013 06:11

    36

    Indeed, Arial and Times are good typefaces.

    I have a feeling that the general idea behind including them was more that they are so frequently used rather than they are bad fonts, but if being used too frequently is a sin, why recommend Helvetica?

    So that doesn’t make much sense.

    These two dont deserve to be on the same list as Comic Sans or Papyrus.

    +2
  • Nikhil Malhotra

    Monday, August 26th, 2013 17:03

    25

    Nicely described the bad points of these fonts. Why use them when so much better alternatives are available.

    Though I have a opinion regarding helvitica font,it should be used only for headings and not the body text.The text seems to be boring when everything is being displayed with bold effect.

    Whats your thought?

    +2
  • ksra

    Monday, August 26th, 2013 11:35

    11

    Hhaha, fonts to avoid. Nothing more to argue.
    I hate TNR because its default-ity. Don’t forget the badass Jokerman..hahah

    Actually when it comes to design, i’ll try to use the balanced font.
    Simple but bold, and get the right feeling to your work.
    And consider the template, the background, the effect, the design, the colour matter.

    I’d love Bebas font. Standar for poster font.

    +1
  • Tim in SF

    Monday, August 26th, 2013 12:26

    13

    Some of these fonts were released FIRST on the Mac OS.

    This post is about “bad” fonts and their histories of usage. It’s a post ostensibly written for designers, yet, nowhere on the entire post is a single mention of “Mac”. Nor is the Chicago font covered, which has a more interesting and notorious usage history than any other font mentioned on this page.

    The post reads like it was written by an eastern European on his Windows computer. Possibly in a basement.

    Your Courier New font example is off. That’s not Courier New.

    +1
    • Rean John Uehara

      Monday, August 26th, 2013 13:07

      17

      Thanks for pointing that out! Updated!

      -2
      • Tim in SF

        Monday, August 26th, 2013 16:12

        21

        Wow. What a bitch I am before I’ve had my morning coffee.

        Your post was just fine. I appreciate your efforts at removing bad fonts from the face of the Earth. Your post would have been better with a mention of Chicago. And it would be nicer if you showed some Mac love. :-) Still, well done. Your efforts are appreciated.

        +1
  • Scott Page

    Monday, August 26th, 2013 09:48

    4

    Hang on a minute, Courier New is great I love the monospace look. Courier is terrible, I’ll give you that, but Courier New is awesome.

    +1
  • Rachel Biel

    Monday, August 26th, 2013 11:12

    9

    I had to laugh at the first half as I felt that they were on target and I had used them myself way back when. I think part of the attraction of Comic Sans is that it is easy to read, but when it does look dated to me now, too. And, Papyrus! It’s such an elegant script, but you’re right…. Some things get overused and lose their value because of it. I still use Arial a lot and don’t see a problem with it, but there are others that I prefer. I use calibri for my email now.

    A couple of questions:

    What font is used on this site?

    What sites do you prefer for finding new fonts?

    +1
  • adolf witzeling

    Monday, August 26th, 2013 16:56

    23

    I agree to some of your choices-some I totally disagree. “Impact” for example if used in the right content (headlines) is very well suitable, same for “stencil”. Some of the fonts listed seemed just to be drawn out of your personal preferences “not to use” drawer. In most instances fonts are not the problem if used correctly, the designer using them incorrectly is. Nice article though, because it raises questions.

    +1
  • Gremeir Mitz Ociones

    Friday, September 13th, 2013 11:15

    40

    If there are only font police, maybe I was caught few years ago. Thank you for this post. From now on, I will make this a guide whenever I have web design works. Coincidentally, I need to redesign my site http://startwithbasix.com because I only free wordpress theme and i want to have my own branding. Maybe I will using this guide. My typography skill sucks :(

    +1
    • Rudolph Musngi

      Monday, September 16th, 2013 18:26

      42

      You might also want to check out our other Typography tutorials. It’s a start. :) Keep trying.

      0
  • jonathanvasey

    Thursday, August 29th, 2013 09:56

    33

    its an good information

    +1
  • Roy

    Tuesday, August 27th, 2013 00:47

    27

    I could add two more that I was forced to use because a client thought they were “Way cool” – Hobo Std and Serpentine (yikes!!!).
    The real Times Roman, originally designed for the New York Times in 1924 to make newspapers easier to read, was very elegant. How it metamorphosed into a tight, squiggly tangle that is Times New Roman I will never know!

    +1
  • davo77

    Monday, August 26th, 2013 11:15

    10

    WTH….. Who made you the Font KGB….Fonts r Fonts…Are we not free men women & acorns….Let them be used as one sees fit….If the choice doesn’t work, then the abuse will come from the masses et al.

    0
    • Tim in SF

      Monday, August 26th, 2013 16:16

      22

      Usage of some fonts are equivalent with talking in the theater. Their use is the mark of a non-designer or someone who hasn’t yet crashed and burned a project because of a bad font choice.

      Everyone wants their stuff to look nicer and more professional: from the designer working on her first web project to the office assistant putting up a sign in the break room. The post is helpful to point that out for people who don’t know any better.

      +3
  • Ruairi Phelan

    Sunday, September 8th, 2013 08:19

    39

    The only font that I disagree with being on the list is Times New Roman.

    It’s a great font

    0
  • Rebecca

    Monday, August 26th, 2013 19:11

    26

    Love this article, my only problem is that Helvertica is soon becoming one of those “arials” the go to font that people will end up going back to too much! Like you said – originality is everything.

    0
  • Eduardo

    Tuesday, September 17th, 2013 16:12

    44

    Lobster is an ok font.. but being overused everywhere! c’mon fellow designers.

    0
  • Danners

    Monday, August 26th, 2013 10:18

    6

    Great article! I am facing a related problem at the moment. Looking to find a good font for my child theme I am building. How about 20 font you shouldn’t avoid??

    All the best

    Dan

    0
  • Bianca Pardue

    Tuesday, September 17th, 2013 09:51

    43

    Hmmm. I love and use all of those fonts. I actually gasped as I went through the list. I even use Papyrus on my business cards. Does that make me a bad designer???

    0
  • Kreativ Fon

    Tuesday, September 3rd, 2013 03:27

    38

    I’m not a big fan o webfonts, so I tend to use classic fonts for my website. In my opinion Trebuchet MS is one of the best classic fonts that fits great on web. I agree that Times New Roman and Arial are NOT to be use on the web …

    0
  • obama

    Wednesday, September 18th, 2013 03:28

    45

    pls, do a up to top button…

    0
  • Max

    Monday, August 26th, 2013 14:54

    19

    Well may you write about fonts Rudolph, however your English grammar is atrocious! Just for the record Rudolph, I have designed a website for a commercial printing and design business with all text in “Comic” and the website has been very effective. Cheers…

    0
  • Will Hancock

    Tuesday, August 27th, 2013 03:25

    28

    Mac monkey hitting on windows fonts.
    Helvetica is awefully designed with its gaps mid word.

    0
  • Gareth (1st Web)

    Monday, August 26th, 2013 13:49

    18

    Sorry to say it, but in many browsers on Windows, Arial still renders better and clearer than many of the open source alternatives such as Open Sans, Droid Sans, etc.

    0
  • Simon

    Thursday, September 19th, 2013 07:03

    46

    Comic sans is actually one of the most readable fonts and has been widely used as a font face of choice for things being used by dyslexic people due to it being easily readable and certain forms of dyslexia being very sensitive to font faces used. Admittedly there are some very good substitutions but I do still see comic sans being used as the font of choice in quite a few government application interfaces simply because it aids dyslexic employees.

    0
  • Peeper

    Monday, August 26th, 2013 12:49

    14

    I like Impact occasionally, it has it purpose in its name.

    0
    • frednetick

      Tuesday, August 27th, 2013 03:50

      29

      I’d rather have League gothic instead..

      0
  • Senthil

    Monday, September 2nd, 2013 07:49

    37

    Really nice.. Thanks for the information.

    0
  • Brooke

    Thursday, August 29th, 2013 14:15

    34

    I agree with a lot of these, although I’m guilty of not fully abandoning Arial myself. I recently started venturing into using Google Web Fonts, but my problem with them is how they are rendered in different browsers, for example, some versions of Firefox, Chrome for Windows, all versions of Opera, and older versions of IE. Often times they look choppy, or distorted and I’m not sure how to remedy this. Because of this I’m still using the standard web-safe fonts, but I would like to be able to take advantage of the wonderful webfonts that are out there.

    Are you, or anyone here familiar with how to fix this?

    0
  • Jerry

    Monday, August 26th, 2013 11:56

    12

    Yes, goodbye Arial !!! – Time to embrace some great Google web fonts:

    http://theultralinx.com/2013/03/5-google-web-font-alternatives-helvetica-arial.html

    -1
  • R.A.M

    Monday, August 26th, 2013 09:48

    3

    If originality is everything, the designer would be making his/her own fonts and would be creating in a vacuum. Creativity does not happen in a vacuum. There is nothing new under the sun, son.
    Those fonts you dismiss have their uses and will likely be around long after both you and I are dust.
    Seriously kid, you should go around the block a few times before you write anything else.

    -5
  • Simon

    Thursday, September 19th, 2013 07:03

    46

    Comic sans is actually one of the most readable fonts and has been widely used as a font face of choice for things being used by dyslexic people due to it being easily readable and certain forms of dyslexia being very sensitive to font faces used. Admittedly there are some very good substitutions but I do still see comic sans being used as the font of choice in quite a few government application interfaces simply because it aids dyslexic employees.

    0
  • obama

    Wednesday, September 18th, 2013 03:28

    45

    pls, do a up to top button…

    0
  • Eduardo

    Tuesday, September 17th, 2013 16:12

    44

    Lobster is an ok font.. but being overused everywhere! c’mon fellow designers.

    0
  • Bianca Pardue

    Tuesday, September 17th, 2013 09:51

    43

    Hmmm. I love and use all of those fonts. I actually gasped as I went through the list. I even use Papyrus on my business cards. Does that make me a bad designer???

    0
  • Gremeir Mitz Ociones

    Friday, September 13th, 2013 11:15

    40

    If there are only font police, maybe I was caught few years ago. Thank you for this post. From now on, I will make this a guide whenever I have web design works. Coincidentally, I need to redesign my site http://startwithbasix.com because I only free wordpress theme and i want to have my own branding. Maybe I will using this guide. My typography skill sucks :(

    +1
    • Rudolph Musngi

      Monday, September 16th, 2013 18:26

      42

      You might also want to check out our other Typography tutorials. It’s a start. :) Keep trying.

      0
  • Ruairi Phelan

    Sunday, September 8th, 2013 08:19

    39

    The only font that I disagree with being on the list is Times New Roman.

    It’s a great font

    0
  • Kreativ Fon

    Tuesday, September 3rd, 2013 03:27

    38

    I’m not a big fan o webfonts, so I tend to use classic fonts for my website. In my opinion Trebuchet MS is one of the best classic fonts that fits great on web. I agree that Times New Roman and Arial are NOT to be use on the web …

    0
  • Senthil

    Monday, September 2nd, 2013 07:49

    37

    Really nice.. Thanks for the information.

    0
  • mmj

    Saturday, August 31st, 2013 06:11

    36

    Indeed, Arial and Times are good typefaces.

    I have a feeling that the general idea behind including them was more that they are so frequently used rather than they are bad fonts, but if being used too frequently is a sin, why recommend Helvetica?

    So that doesn’t make much sense.

    These two dont deserve to be on the same list as Comic Sans or Papyrus.

    +2
  • Brooke

    Thursday, August 29th, 2013 14:15

    34

    I agree with a lot of these, although I’m guilty of not fully abandoning Arial myself. I recently started venturing into using Google Web Fonts, but my problem with them is how they are rendered in different browsers, for example, some versions of Firefox, Chrome for Windows, all versions of Opera, and older versions of IE. Often times they look choppy, or distorted and I’m not sure how to remedy this. Because of this I’m still using the standard web-safe fonts, but I would like to be able to take advantage of the wonderful webfonts that are out there.

    Are you, or anyone here familiar with how to fix this?

    0
  • jonathanvasey

    Thursday, August 29th, 2013 09:56

    33

    its an good information

    +1
  • Falling Brick

    Wednesday, August 28th, 2013 04:37

    32

    True, except these -Times New Roman, Arial.

    +2
  • Erinah

    Tuesday, August 27th, 2013 15:27

    31

    Georgia (a serif) as a substitute for Arial???
    Concourse (san serif) as a substitute for Times New Roman???
    Why not simply list all available fonts :))

    Palatino is really a wonderful alternative to Times New Roman (but do not even use the Book Antiqua name, plz)
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Palatino#Book_Antiqua_and_other_unauthorised_versions

    +2
  • Alex

    Tuesday, August 27th, 2013 09:34

    30

    If I hear another so-called designer come out with this tired cliche font-snobbery then I will show them a picture of gassed children in Syria and ask them if the fact that their local take-away used it in their menu is something worth being angry about?

    Designers and typographers care about typography. The general public are subconsciously affected by typography ( the ‘feel’ of quality for example ) BUT they don’t care about it enough to even know what it means.

    It’s up to you as designers to do good stuff with typography. You don’t need to worry about amateurs or beginner designers using poor-taste typefaces. Because you will not use them, and therefore your work will stand out.

    It says to me ‘I’m a little insecure about my work so I must go on about crap typefaces to assert my authority as a designer’.

    +2
  • Will Hancock

    Tuesday, August 27th, 2013 03:25

    28

    Mac monkey hitting on windows fonts.
    Helvetica is awefully designed with its gaps mid word.

    0
  • Roy

    Tuesday, August 27th, 2013 00:47

    27

    I could add two more that I was forced to use because a client thought they were “Way cool” – Hobo Std and Serpentine (yikes!!!).
    The real Times Roman, originally designed for the New York Times in 1924 to make newspapers easier to read, was very elegant. How it metamorphosed into a tight, squiggly tangle that is Times New Roman I will never know!

    +1
  • Rebecca

    Monday, August 26th, 2013 19:11

    26

    Love this article, my only problem is that Helvertica is soon becoming one of those “arials” the go to font that people will end up going back to too much! Like you said – originality is everything.

    0
  • Nikhil Malhotra

    Monday, August 26th, 2013 17:03

    25

    Nicely described the bad points of these fonts. Why use them when so much better alternatives are available.

    Though I have a opinion regarding helvitica font,it should be used only for headings and not the body text.The text seems to be boring when everything is being displayed with bold effect.

    Whats your thought?

    +2
  • adolf witzeling

    Monday, August 26th, 2013 16:56

    23

    I agree to some of your choices-some I totally disagree. “Impact” for example if used in the right content (headlines) is very well suitable, same for “stencil”. Some of the fonts listed seemed just to be drawn out of your personal preferences “not to use” drawer. In most instances fonts are not the problem if used correctly, the designer using them incorrectly is. Nice article though, because it raises questions.

    +1
  • Emanuele

    Monday, August 26th, 2013 15:22

    20

    I am sorry, but I think Impact is a pretty good font that can be successfully used in different context to create, like, impact. It’s reasonably tall, it’s well rounded and – since it’s intended to be used for big display texts – it reads reasonably well. Clearly, if you use it for the body you are neither a designer nor an entirely sane being.

    I agree on everything else, though.

    +9
  • Max

    Monday, August 26th, 2013 14:54

    19

    Well may you write about fonts Rudolph, however your English grammar is atrocious! Just for the record Rudolph, I have designed a website for a commercial printing and design business with all text in “Comic” and the website has been very effective. Cheers…

    0
  • Gareth (1st Web)

    Monday, August 26th, 2013 13:49

    18

    Sorry to say it, but in many browsers on Windows, Arial still renders better and clearer than many of the open source alternatives such as Open Sans, Droid Sans, etc.

    0
  • darrell

    Monday, August 26th, 2013 13:04

    16

    rachel, this site uses

    font-family: “HelveticaNeue-Light”, “Helvetica Neue Light”, “Helvetica Neue”, “HelveticaNeue”, “HelveticaNeueLT”, Helvetica, Arial, “Lucida Grande”, sans-serif;

    this is from the css ( use inspect element feature of your browser ). what this is is a list of prefered font, so, if one isnt found early in the list then it chooses the next font, so, if your computer doesnt have the helvetica fonts listed, this site does use Arial

    +10
  • Jonas

    Monday, August 26th, 2013 12:59

    15

    Arial and times new roman? realy, i don’t think so

    +17
  • Peeper

    Monday, August 26th, 2013 12:49

    14

    I like Impact occasionally, it has it purpose in its name.

    0
    • frednetick

      Tuesday, August 27th, 2013 03:50

      29

      I’d rather have League gothic instead..

      0
  • Tim in SF

    Monday, August 26th, 2013 12:26

    13

    Some of these fonts were released FIRST on the Mac OS.

    This post is about “bad” fonts and their histories of usage. It’s a post ostensibly written for designers, yet, nowhere on the entire post is a single mention of “Mac”. Nor is the Chicago font covered, which has a more interesting and notorious usage history than any other font mentioned on this page.

    The post reads like it was written by an eastern European on his Windows computer. Possibly in a basement.

    Your Courier New font example is off. That’s not Courier New.

    +1
    • Rean John Uehara

      Monday, August 26th, 2013 13:07

      17

      Thanks for pointing that out! Updated!

      -2
      • Tim in SF

        Monday, August 26th, 2013 16:12

        21

        Wow. What a bitch I am before I’ve had my morning coffee.

        Your post was just fine. I appreciate your efforts at removing bad fonts from the face of the Earth. Your post would have been better with a mention of Chicago. And it would be nicer if you showed some Mac love. :-) Still, well done. Your efforts are appreciated.

        +1
  • Jerry

    Monday, August 26th, 2013 11:56

    12

    Yes, goodbye Arial !!! – Time to embrace some great Google web fonts:

    http://theultralinx.com/2013/03/5-google-web-font-alternatives-helvetica-arial.html

    -1
  • ksra

    Monday, August 26th, 2013 11:35

    11

    Hhaha, fonts to avoid. Nothing more to argue.
    I hate TNR because its default-ity. Don’t forget the badass Jokerman..hahah

    Actually when it comes to design, i’ll try to use the balanced font.
    Simple but bold, and get the right feeling to your work.
    And consider the template, the background, the effect, the design, the colour matter.

    I’d love Bebas font. Standar for poster font.

    +1
  • davo77

    Monday, August 26th, 2013 11:15

    10

    WTH….. Who made you the Font KGB….Fonts r Fonts…Are we not free men women & acorns….Let them be used as one sees fit….If the choice doesn’t work, then the abuse will come from the masses et al.

    0
    • Tim in SF

      Monday, August 26th, 2013 16:16

      22

      Usage of some fonts are equivalent with talking in the theater. Their use is the mark of a non-designer or someone who hasn’t yet crashed and burned a project because of a bad font choice.

      Everyone wants their stuff to look nicer and more professional: from the designer working on her first web project to the office assistant putting up a sign in the break room. The post is helpful to point that out for people who don’t know any better.

      +3
  • Rachel Biel

    Monday, August 26th, 2013 11:12

    9

    I had to laugh at the first half as I felt that they were on target and I had used them myself way back when. I think part of the attraction of Comic Sans is that it is easy to read, but when it does look dated to me now, too. And, Papyrus! It’s such an elegant script, but you’re right…. Some things get overused and lose their value because of it. I still use Arial a lot and don’t see a problem with it, but there are others that I prefer. I use calibri for my email now.

    A couple of questions:

    What font is used on this site?

    What sites do you prefer for finding new fonts?

    +1
  • paolo

    Monday, August 26th, 2013 10:44

    8

    arial and times new roman? are you kiddin? what the hell…
    arial is the main webdesign font….

    +10
    • mmj

      Saturday, August 31st, 2013 06:06

      35

      Indeed, Arial and Times are good typefaces.

      I have a feeling that the general idea behind including them was more that they are so frequently used rather than they are bad fonts, but if being used too frequently is a sin, why recommend Helvetica?

      So that doesn’t make much sense.

      These two dont deserve to be on the same list as Comic Sans or Papyrus.

      +4
  • leckerei

    Monday, August 26th, 2013 10:33

    7

    You can add LOBSTER ! The new comic sans !

    +4
    • manuel

      Monday, August 26th, 2013 17:00

      24

      nice.. thank you

      +2
    • Katherine

      Monday, September 16th, 2013 13:52

      41

      FAIL. There’s absolutely nothing to support that parallel.

      +2
  • Danners

    Monday, August 26th, 2013 10:18

    6

    Great article! I am facing a related problem at the moment. Looking to find a good font for my child theme I am building. How about 20 font you shouldn’t avoid??

    All the best

    Dan

    0
  • PixoMarc

    Monday, August 26th, 2013 10:12

    5

    Someone should really flip out their notebook (like the Police) and give these offenders a ticket! While I agree with you on most of fonts listed here, some fonts are required for designs in a particular niche / genre e.g. Stencil is a good font for military themed designs and so on.

    As for the websites are concerned, I would say that Google fonts are the best bet for those who don’t want to invest in fonts and still design something out of the ordinary. Many clients do insist on certain fonts which may clash with the designer’s view – in this case, it is best to educate the client and show the difference in a design comp.

    +11
  • Scott Page

    Monday, August 26th, 2013 09:48

    4

    Hang on a minute, Courier New is great I love the monospace look. Courier is terrible, I’ll give you that, but Courier New is awesome.

    +1
  • R.A.M

    Monday, August 26th, 2013 09:48

    3

    If originality is everything, the designer would be making his/her own fonts and would be creating in a vacuum. Creativity does not happen in a vacuum. There is nothing new under the sun, son.
    Those fonts you dismiss have their uses and will likely be around long after both you and I are dust.
    Seriously kid, you should go around the block a few times before you write anything else.

    -5
  • used impact before

    Monday, August 26th, 2013 09:39

    2

    i used impact once or twice :(

    +3
  • Oliver Mannay

    Monday, August 26th, 2013 09:39

    1

    Thanks for the article. A quick point about Courier New: I agree that it’s not pretty, mainly because it’s a monospace font, but it’s vital for many web designers. While it’s a horrible choice for almost any other use (and I have seen some terrible examples from ‘designers’ in the past), it’s fantastic for displaying code, and for tables of numbers when you don’t have access to lining numerals and don’t mind that monospace look.

    +4

Comments are closed.

54.161.175.231 - unknown - unknown - US