Anastasia Miles

Project manager, website designer and freelance copywriter. Interested in SEO and marketing, friendly and always ready to discuss new opportunities. Love coffee, cats, gadgets and chocolate :) Speak English, Russian and a little bit of German. Visit my new DesignTermite Website Design Studio or follow DesignTermite on Twitter

15 responses to “How To Make The Right Keyword Analysis For Your Website (Part-2)”

  1. andy

    I can’t agree more than with the sentiments about writing in a natural way.

    If you write using original content and naturally the article/blog whatever will be reader friendly but……and this is also important……it will have a good keyword density, spread etc.

    Your main keywords will be covered but so too the long-tail and the latent semantic indexing takes care of itself.

    Yes get the title and headings sorted as you say and also the meta description to help with telling what the page is about, but at the end of the day just write naturally!

    Andy

  2. david

    Its a real puzzle to get this right and in learning it is necessary to do a little experimenting. Great info!

    /David

  3. WebGuide4U

    stuffing of keywords is bad in terms of seo and most of the newbies will not consider it and sometimes being penalised. As an SEO consultant most of the time i tell my clients to use H2-H6 headlines after the H1 headline.
    And most of the seo tips are available on SEOMOZ.ORG.

  4. Mike

    Thanks for the useful information. It’s the first time I knew about the four characteristics of a page keyword analysis

  5. Ashley N. Cline

    I always think of just making sure the H1 tag is “optimized” – I never took in to consideration the importance H2-H6 could make! Good advice!

  6. Jae Xavier

    content is king.

    seo methods will continue to change today, tomorrow, at the time of my death.

    content will live on. like elvis.

  7. Vaderist

    Great article, but then I looked at the authors Web site. Wow, is that copy hard to read. With so much emphasis in this article on making copy readable to humans, I’d have thought her copy would have been better. Grammatically incorrect and misspellings. BTW, Web is always capitalized and Web site is always two words. Look it up. I think I’ll take Anon’s advice and check out SEOMoz.

  8. clervius

    This is very informative. And @Anon, as someone who has attended a number of Google SEO conferences, and with personal experience. Some of the things mentioned in Google Webmaster does not matter. Especially in regards to the description meta tag. EVERY time I include that in a website, and search for it on Google, the description is always used, and some of the keywords are emphasized.

    This would have been a better read had there not been so many grammatical errors in it.

  9. Peach

    It is correct, that google ignores the description meta tag, but there are also other serach engines like yahoo and bing, so it can maybe be helpful for the others. The title and the url name are very important for every search engine. The textes on the pages shouldn’t be found on other Webpages. It is very very important, that you have unique content on to your page. The inimitability of your homepage makes it very interesting for the index of the search engines.

  10. Nikunj

    I have seen results based on meta description optimization & ya Google does not support meta keywords but yahoo & bing gives relevant weight to meta keywords.

    Stuff keywords is not recommended but optimization of content using proper keywords at proper places is advised.

    and @Anoa if you are reader of SEOMoz then you will find some of the seo tips similar to this one.

  11. Ilyse Klavir

    I really enjoyed reading this perspective on keyword analysis and the breakdown into four key categories. I agree that nobody likes spammy keyword stuffed articles and we all want a more useful and relevant internet. On the other hand, I think it is somewhat of a stretch to assume that any search engine is truly “organic” and that it always delivers the most relevant content rich results without the author clearly identifying content based on an understanding of how search engines work.

  12. Anon

    According to Google

    [http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2009/09/google-does-not-use-keywords-meta-tag.html]

    the meta description doesn’t help in ranking any higher in the SERPs: “we still don’t use the description meta tag in our ranking.”

    Also, your suggestions about keyword density will lead to one thing only – poor quality, annoying and unreadable content.

    If the content you’ve written for the page is relevant to your chosen keywords it will contain them naturally, and this is enough.

    Stuffing keywords in with the sole aim of increasing the density will just ruin the text.

    And a minimum of 100 words? So few words says one thing to me: there’s no point having a page for it in the first place.

    Sure, optimise the title, URL, and link text on the site but leave the content alone.

    I’d advise anyone reading this to ignore most of the SEO advice you find on a design blog, and go look at SEOMoz instead. They’re the experts.

    1. Ben

      Meta Description doesn’t help with ranking but it does change what is displayed on the results pages. A well written description will result in higher click through rates when your results are displayed to the person searching.

      Keywords for the sake of it are bad, but there’s still some sound advice here. As long as you act sensibly and try to keep your users in mind you can’t go too far wrong.

Leave a Reply